| Username | Litigator_AB |
| Real Name | |
| Rank | Novice Member |
| Joined | August 15, 2008 |
| Gender | Male |
| Age | 33 |
| Location | Edmonton, AB, Canada |
| Last Visit | September 15, 2008 |
| Post Count | 201 |
| Biography | Lawyer. |
| Quote |
Originally posted by Dekron
Originally posted by HYPERI0NSadly no it was a local story in the local Newspaper, and it was over a year ago. Of course now people are very carefull now in what they do as they dont want to get sued. And for Gods sake dont help anyone in trouble as you could get sued
This is why Lawyer firms offering cheap risk free court cases should be shot. Oh and on such firms with no win no fee deals a new one has started advertising for children
He would be charged with battery. Assault is threatening, but not the actual "touching".
Luckily we have "Good Samaritan" laws here that prevent such lawsuits. They aren't perfect, but it's better than getting sued for something such as that.
Actually that depends. Many jurisdictions conflate battery into an assault charge. This combination is severable criminally and civilly as well.
The current stock price does not affect Funcom at the moment. It only affects investors and their returns.
The money raised from the public stock offering is Funcom's to do with what they wish (within the parameters of the corporate constitution and bylaws).
In the future the horrible state of Funcom stock will limit future sources of capital.
End.
Lit
Sometimes I don't know where the line will be drawn.
The U.S. is in some pretty severe economic/social/political trouble right now.
Tort reform in the US should be a top priority. The US civil law system is in disarray and is prima facie evidence of the superiority of common law adjudication.
Those Homeowner association bylaws would easily be found to be unconstitutional in the current social environment.
What are your views on PvP?