| Username | Vegetta |
| Real Name | |
| Rank | Apprentice Member |
| Joined | May 9, 2006 |
| Gender | Male |
| Age | (hidden) |
| Location | Pittsburgh, PA, United States |
| Last Visit | November 26, 2008 |
| Post Count | 221 |
| Biography |
|
| Quote |
instead of a dungeon make it an entire zone of the city of mordheim.
Doesn't matter which scenario it is of if I am winning or losing - after running about 3 scenarios in a row I get super bored with them.
TBH I dont see much difference in grinding mobs or players in scenarios.
I do like doing the PVP quests in the lakes - but (sadly) rarely ever see anybody in them while doing them.
I wouldnt go back to WOW if it was the only MMO and they payed me to play it.
Originally posted by Blodpls
Originally posted by ste2000
Originally posted by UnSubHow did they organise testing?
Sometimes it was RvR battles, sometimes scenarios, sometimes the Elves starting zone and so on.
This way we couldn't complain about how repetitive was the gameplay, because we were allowed access only pieces at a time, and couldn't test the gameplay as a whole.
There you go
Omg, I've seen people on this forum boasting about how Mythic let them them test the whole game and how they were not hiding anything compared to Funcom. It shows how much BS people talk.
The people who made such claims should be ashamed of themselves.
they did let people test the whole game (For the most part) they just split it up into sections.
OP makes some good points
WAR's itemization is complete crap (Samey-boring-bland)
The crafting system is pretty useless as well.
Open World RVR should give better xp and renown
server pops need to be more balanced
still, I'm having fun in WAR and will be playing it for a while.
In your opinion, what kind of gamer are you?